Blogs

Customer Experience for the Future: Outside-In Beyond Skin-Deep

By Lynn Hunsaker, CCXP posted 02-13-2018 07:44 PM

  

outside in customer experience"Outside-in" is a popular term in the customer experience field. It refers to the importance of customers' inputs as a guiding light for the inner workings of an enterprise. In the quest for "outside-in" most companies have voice of the customer programs, loyalty programs, and high-touch service. Even so, these outside-in efforts are typically skin-deep. Outside-in is often only being brought into the customer-facing portions of the company. And the rest of the company is still behaving in inside-out mode. In the future, companies that are truly outside-in will outpace their competitors in success.

A consequence of skin-deep outside-in is a mis-match of customer-facing messages with the reality of processes, policies, business models and products. How many companies do you buy from where this is the case? Most likely, your answer is more than there should be! Mis-matches may be tolerated presently, but they do not bode well for the future. Customers' trust is eroded by inconsistency. Especially with inconsistencies between what is said and what is done. It's the non-customer-facing parts of the company that generally create the bulk of what customers buy and experience. Customer-facing staff and touch points are often a buffer between mis-matches and heroic efforts to mollify or endear customers.

Let's compare superficial versus true outside-in (read from left column to right column, line by line):

Your Approach Skin-Deep Outside-In True Outside-In
VoC asks . . .   how the company is doing   how to support customers’ goals
Journey maps focus on . . .   touch-points   customers’ consequences
Closed-loop communication is with . . .   low-raters   all customers
Customer comments are . . .   summarized   read by everyone
Metrics focus on . . .   customers’ behavior/ratings   VoC action plan progress
Fixes . . .   are by customer or by department   prevent recurrence for all customers
Voc action . . .   planning is optional or by top issues   plans are systemic, involving everyone
Skill building focuses on . . .   customer-facing staff   internal value-chain
Marketing . . .   leverages the positive   is grounded in customers’ realities
Customer retention . . .   is pushed   is earned
CX investments . . .   make up for mistakes   aims at doing right the first time
CX excellence is . . .   customer-facing groups’ job   a way of life, no exceptions
CX insights are applied to . . .   image-building   policies, rituals and culture
Goal: . . .   customer evangelism (immediate revenue)   mutual value creation (organic growth)
Attitude: . . .   what can customers do for us?   what can we do for customers?

True outside-in requires humility and falling in love with customers. It's akin to keeping a romance fresh. It's about aligning the company to the boss: customers. Not the other way around. It recognizes that shareholders leave when customers leave, not the other way around.

True outside-in rises above industry norms. It looks objectively at the plight of customers, and strives to stand out from the crowd in fitting like a glove to customers' needs. It rises above mainstream customer experience management practices, as described in the table above. It considers what makes the most sense for long-term value to all parties: customers, employees, investors, and other stakeholders. For example, in the book Firms of Endearment, the most-loved companies have a balanced approach to managing the interests of all stakeholders, and their performance far outpaces their competitors and the S&P 500.

True outside-in is transformation-oriented. Transforming the inside, not the outside. Yet using customer experience insights to guide it, not traditional cost and politicking parameters. One of our clients was sophisticated in value stream mapping, or process management for smooth flow of information and materials. Prioritization of improvements was based on issue frequency and cost to the company. When our customer experience journey mapping quantified consequences to customers, it became clear that the standard prioritization formula was flawed. Customers were splitting their orders with different suppliers because of inconsistency in delivery times. By omitting customer consequences from its internal criteria, the company was unknowingly losing significant revenue that was going to competitors. Prioritization first by consequences to customers, and second by cost to the company made a lot of sense, considering that customers' well-being is a prerequisite to the company's growth.

True outside-in is value-creating. Not just value-extracting. We've all seen industries implement policies to extract value from customers without value creation, and it's not a pretty situation. Customers have already paid fair market value for our product. To extend revenue, we should extend value to continue a fair dynamic for customers to further engage with us. Focusing on the customers' goals can make a huge difference in what we can achieve through customer experience management. First of all, it gives employees and suppliers a higher purpose. Second, it is the key to being more innovative, and more successful in launches. Third, it characterizes expectation-sets. Customer segmentation and CX personas based on expectation-sets are more natural and a better view of reality, and they are instrumental to every manager using CX excellence as a context for their decisions and deliverables.

It's human nature to be inward-focused. Yet inward-focus is dysfunctional. We know that's true for any type of relationship. Like the saying, "No man is an island", a keen awareness of how we affect and rely on others is a sign of maturity in any aspect of life. Otherwise, as much as we're reaching out, it's actually from an inside-out, self-serving perspective. Companies that make customers' well-being a guiding light for the inner workings of the entire enterprise will rise above the pack in the future.

This article is the third in a series of articles about Customer Experience for the Future.


Photo licensed to ClearAction by Shutterstock.
2 comments
19 views

Permalink

Comments

03-12-2018 05:47 PM

Thanks for your comment, Ed. As you point out, there are several varieties of skin-deep, with CX as a customer-facing domain only as one of the predominant practices. 

That's why the CCXP's "Organizational Adoption & Accountability" competency is crucial for all of us to master and nurture in our companies. HCL Technologies is a great case study for absorbing "customers first" insights to inform employee engagement and business process/policy upgrades: https://clearaction.com/customers-first-employees-first/

02-19-2018 01:42 PM

​Lynn, this is excellent. I liken your skin-deep analogy to CX-lite. Too many organizations are in this interesting gray zone - they do more than give lip service to customer commitment, or even articulate what they do as CX focused-- but it's skin deep, as you put it. They attack process improvements or VOC (all important of course), but just sub-sets of the far deeper and more meaningful model of "deep tissue" CX. I know of one very large company that still sees CX as product improvement and pain point removal. It's all very technical with a laundry list of changes. There's very little on culture and the human element. I would argue without a hard and honest look at core values, mission, and purpose, and workforce empowerment, wellness, physical environmental changes (i.e. "nudges" to influence behavior), and everything else that comes with true employee engagement, it's ... skin-deep CX. Thanks for the interesting analogy to help tell the story and build the case for change. Press on!